This is a rough sketch of an idea about black holes, time, energy, mass and gravity.
Lately I have had a resurgence in my fascination of the constructs of the universe. Mainly in the areas of black holes. The idea of using infinity as a mathematical number does not sit well with me. If something archives infinity then it must have approached infinity. What would then be the last number reached before declared infinite? Oddly I think I might be able to shed some light on this.
Opposites
If there is one lesson this Universe has taught us is that there is always an opposite. This begs the question, “Is the absence of something its opposite?” Is the opposite of gravity the absence of gravity or anti gravity? Is this the same as the opposite of lightness is darkness? If light is generated using photons then this would me that anything that is not a photon is the opposite of a photon? As one could imagine the opposite game is a very slippery slope.
For the purpose of this post we will focus on the opposite of time and gravity. Which could be one in the same.
Gravity is caused by matter. Would then anti-matter cause anti-gravity? Simply putting anti in front of something does not make it an opposite, or even real. If E=MC^2 then we know that there is a relationship between mass and energy. Would then Energy be the opposite of mass?
Jumping Ahead
Since I am not a scientist I am not going to attempt to “prove” anything, instead toss my idea out there.
Mass generates gravity while energy generates time. We exist in the Universe because of the energy bound within the mass of an atom. When a black hole collapses onto itself this energy is being squeezed out of the atoms and subatomic particles. The Hawking radiation is the last breath of this process. Hawking’s is incorrect in thinking that the black hole is leaking its substance and will then evaporate. Though the black hole will eventually dissipate once all of its energy is finally dispersed but it will not evaporate in the sense Hawking describes. Instead, without any energy and being strictly mass the black hole will loose its anchor to time and we will simply move passed it. The information retained in the black hole will still exist however will be outside of the jurisdiction of time and thus be undetectable to us. This would make sense of Hawking’s claim that the information is retained in a different dimension in which the black hole never existed. The information would be retained in a dimension outside of time which would be no time the opposite of eternity.
Eternity is governed by all time in which all areas of it are instantly accessible. Once matter is introduced a dimple in space occurs and time is then slowed down and a timeline forms.
The ultimate fate of the Universe
As the Universe draws to a close the energy of the universe will be separated from the matter that has capsuled it since the the beginning. Energy and Mass will become dislodged in time. All of the energy since the beginning of the Universe is still with us, but undetectable because we are following a timeline and energy is not. What we are in now is when Mass and Energy’s paths cross. When all of the energy is released from Mass the Mass of this Universe will be lost in time as the energy dissipates into eternity. Once the separation is complete the eternity or infinity of the energy will move across all points and planes of existence until it is finally comes together in critical mass creating another big bang. Once that occurs the matter lost in time will be pulled out of its notime state and eternity will end and the universe will be reborn.
Where does the Universe come from and where does it go?
Let me work on that question.
1 response so far ↓
1 parapente // Feb 4, 2010 at 11:01 am
Perhaps time can be viewed as an outward “pressure” exerted by “energy”? As such time is infact what we (3 diamentional creatures) perceive as “space”.Gravity(mass?) being the opposite – and has the effect of reducing time (and therefore space).Gravity (it is postulated) maybe a property of s subatomic particle and “dark” energy/matter is a combination of particles that omit this particular type.Whether there is a particle whose energy (proprty) is space (time) I have no idea -but perhaps possible? (we are in he relms of string theory here).
So if you could build an object that was constructed of particles that did not contain the “mass/gravity” property in theory you would be free of the “drag” that limits us to light speed.Perhaps there are such particles (zooming about way above the speed of light and therefore free of the time limit also.However since it would have no mass how would we (mass based organisms) ever observe them?
You must log in to post a comment.